![]() ![]() Unfortunately I have not been able to test it in deeper snow yet but I reckon coldly that it will behave like a Bibby but a little narrower. No broad-legged notches in fact, it is possible that it is the stiffness and cushioning that is behind it. In a short cord turn, I experience that it goes really well, even in a rock-hard piste. However, the transition between cord and insert is almost seamless. However, it is happy to release the insert and skid out. The radius is relatively long + 25m so it is not a ski you lie and carve in a steep piste, but it can of course be driven on inserts when it flattens out. There are no no tendencies to cut or anything. ![]() Regardless of the surface, the ski guides you where you point your toes. PB&J was the obvious choice and it delivers immediately. Now I still wanted to go down a bit in width and supplement the quiver with a slightly more reasonable waist width for resort skiing in Sweden. Bibby is the ski that taught me to go off-piste and forest, mostly thanks to this. With Moments shape, that problem disappears. A rigid ski becomes more predictable, but with a classic shape, the rigid ski becomes impossible for non-experts to handle. The ski becomes unpredictable as it is constantly bent very differently. The problem with soft skis often arises when you go out on uneven ground. Personally, I prefer Moments variant where you get a ski that is really stiff and predictable but where the shape, with a clear twin rocker gets a ski that is very easy to ride in varied terrain. Many skis try to be "kind" and easy to ride by being soft. In both cases it is about really stiff skis with a playful shape. PB&J is actually the same ski but with a 16mm narrower waist. I'm almost biased here as I've been riding big brother Bibby Pro for many years as my only ski. A little diffuse on inserts and no direct pop ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |